During the first industrial revolution, for example, people were literally used up until they died. All age groups, including children. That must have caused a massive demographic shift. In addition, the introduction of mass production created jobs in industry in quantities that may have been underestimated in this scale and maybe with this the scale of wages to pay. The experience has been gained of how mass production processes need to be designed, but the guinea pigs for these studies have simply been "removed" from the payroll?
Whatever was declared as Spanish flu, it could not have been caused by a virus, because that is the only trigger that has definitely never been proven to be real.
The Spanish flu was definitely a cover up for something else to do with the war, i.e. a fig leaf for WWII. Nobody doubted the point of the war thanks to this ruse, so the masses went into the next war with flying colours just two decades later.
There are many possible explanations. Perhaps there were not the millions of deaths that are rumoured. Perhaps weapons of mass destruction were tested in the First World War that were to be used in the Second World War. Weapons are developed over decades. It was the time of the first industrial revolution. For the first time, processes, materials and chemicals were used that had never been used before on this scale. Any form of influence is conceivable, but viruses were not a component. For lack of existence.
South africa the people started dropping dead even in the streets. People who werenot even in the war (I presume). A country that was not bombing chemicals in its own country....Thus there was more than just 'war conditions'.
From the newly installed radios of commercial use, cause military hav done there thing in war, to vaccinations to something else....?
Between 1914 and 1918, over 250,000 South Africans of all races, from a population of 6 million, volunteered to serve with the Allied forces.
Thousands more enlisted in the British Army directly, with over 3,000 joining the British Royal Flying Corps.
More than 146,000 Whites, 83,000 Blacks, and 2,500 blacks and Indians fought in either German South West Africa, East Africa, the Middle East, or in Europe on the Western Front.
Do you have any sources for South African people "dropping dead in the streets?"
There is one other factor that Michael Bryant overlooked. Long range radio was beginning to be used by the military and gradually, it was installed around the world. That would have significantly changed the electro-magnetic radiation in the atmosphere, and as it progressed, it would have affected everyone. The symptoms of influenza used to be known as neurasthenia. See the chart at the foot of this article:
He did mention it, but only briefly, if memory serves, but the majority of deaths, as he noted, were in a very specific age range and mostly males, which correlates with the war. That said, EMF certainly had an impact, I would argue.
During the first industrial revolution, for example, people were literally used up until they died. All age groups, including children. That must have caused a massive demographic shift. In addition, the introduction of mass production created jobs in industry in quantities that may have been underestimated in this scale and maybe with this the scale of wages to pay. The experience has been gained of how mass production processes need to be designed, but the guinea pigs for these studies have simply been "removed" from the payroll?
Whatever was declared as Spanish flu, it could not have been caused by a virus, because that is the only trigger that has definitely never been proven to be real.
The Spanish flu was definitely a cover up for something else to do with the war, i.e. a fig leaf for WWII. Nobody doubted the point of the war thanks to this ruse, so the masses went into the next war with flying colours just two decades later.
There are many possible explanations. Perhaps there were not the millions of deaths that are rumoured. Perhaps weapons of mass destruction were tested in the First World War that were to be used in the Second World War. Weapons are developed over decades. It was the time of the first industrial revolution. For the first time, processes, materials and chemicals were used that had never been used before on this scale. Any form of influence is conceivable, but viruses were not a component. For lack of existence.
Duplicate.
South africa the people started dropping dead even in the streets. People who werenot even in the war (I presume). A country that was not bombing chemicals in its own country....Thus there was more than just 'war conditions'.
From the newly installed radios of commercial use, cause military hav done there thing in war, to vaccinations to something else....?
Between 1914 and 1918, over 250,000 South Africans of all races, from a population of 6 million, volunteered to serve with the Allied forces.
Thousands more enlisted in the British Army directly, with over 3,000 joining the British Royal Flying Corps.
More than 146,000 Whites, 83,000 Blacks, and 2,500 blacks and Indians fought in either German South West Africa, East Africa, the Middle East, or in Europe on the Western Front.
Do you have any sources for South African people "dropping dead in the streets?"
There is one other factor that Michael Bryant overlooked. Long range radio was beginning to be used by the military and gradually, it was installed around the world. That would have significantly changed the electro-magnetic radiation in the atmosphere, and as it progressed, it would have affected everyone. The symptoms of influenza used to be known as neurasthenia. See the chart at the foot of this article:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/there-is-no-virus-there-is-no-lab
He did mention it, but only briefly, if memory serves, but the majority of deaths, as he noted, were in a very specific age range and mostly males, which correlates with the war. That said, EMF certainly had an impact, I would argue.